Pages

▼

Thursday, February 17, 2011

Twins' Night Out

[singing]

From a distance,
You look liiiike some boobs,
Even though I know you're not.

From a distance,
How could I eeeeaaaeeever choose,
A sleeping jughead tot?

From a distance,
We've all had enough,
And this won't be allowed to stand.
And there is no way - no how
That you cannot seeeee!
Big frosted tracts of land.


Thanks to Gina C., who would like to remind bakers that God is watching us.

at

82 comments:

  1. SarahFebruary 17, 2011 at 9:36 AM

    HA!! That's so funny - I really did see boobs when I saw the cake.

    Thanks for keeping me laughing!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Jules AFFebruary 17, 2011 at 9:37 AM

    Even if they didn't look like boobs, they are still super creepy!

    ReplyDelete
  3. JennifferFebruary 17, 2011 at 9:38 AM

    What??? No jokes about "the twins"? Seriously, I spit coffee from just seeing this cake!!

    ReplyDelete
  4. HollyFebruary 17, 2011 at 9:39 AM

    They have HUGE tracts of land.

    ReplyDelete
  5. KristiFebruary 17, 2011 at 9:40 AM

    Bette Midler and boob/baby cakes. I love this day already.

    WV: enduf
    I have had enduf of having a stubbed up nose.

    ReplyDelete
  6. elissaFebruary 17, 2011 at 9:43 AM

    I need brain bleach.

    ReplyDelete
  7. AngelaFebruary 17, 2011 at 9:50 AM

    Even when you said they weren't breasts, that's still all I could see. Until I noticed the eyelashes.

    Creeeeepy.

    ReplyDelete
  8. MelodyFebruary 17, 2011 at 9:52 AM

    I had too look back before I noticed they were babies. LOL

    ReplyDelete
  9. ColleenFebruary 17, 2011 at 9:56 AM

    Horrible!

    ReplyDelete
  10. Fluffy CowFebruary 17, 2011 at 9:57 AM

    *Bleck*

    ReplyDelete
  11. NikkiFebruary 17, 2011 at 10:00 AM

    CRAP! Now I have that darn song in my head!

    Thanks Jen! :P

    ReplyDelete
  12. Loo-E Loo-IFebruary 17, 2011 at 10:05 AM

    Oh my, what a gaudy spectacle!

    I nipple, oops, I mean *notice* that the boobies, oops again, *babies* look like they came from the pregnant torso cake pan, minus the belly. I see they found a clever use of the "nose".

    wv: plerses: One baby plerses one baby equals twins.

    ReplyDelete
  13. TrevorFebruary 17, 2011 at 10:06 AM

    okay, that's SO wrong. Just SO wrong. That's all I could say when I looked at this.

    ReplyDelete
  14. EllenFebruary 17, 2011 at 10:27 AM

    Mixed emotions:

    I adore a good song parody -- thank you!

    I will never be able to see a pacifier without thinking of nipples again -- darn you!

    And it's even the wrong end of the pacifier to bring that image to mine!

    I'm so confused now.

    ReplyDelete
  15. AnonymousFebruary 17, 2011 at 10:39 AM

    Monty lives on! HUGE tracts of land indeed! Bwhahahaha!

    wv:senso. Nice to realize that others share my odd? senso humour.heh.

    ReplyDelete
  16. NancyFebruary 17, 2011 at 10:45 AM

    Okay, so before I scrolled down to the commentary I thought - good heavens! Why isn't this cake being censored like the other topless cakes she's posted??

    ReplyDelete
  17. BeckyFebruary 17, 2011 at 10:51 AM

    Oh my... really? They really took a torso cake and make "babies" out of it? Those nipple-noses are just so wrong!

    ReplyDelete
  18. Sandy C also in SoFlaFebruary 17, 2011 at 11:12 AM

    The first thing I thought was, "WHAT THE -what is on those boobs??!!

    Then... I saw eyes.. and...hair? Metalic, shiny hair? And infant hair bands--REAL infant hair bands?

    OMG it's supposed to be twins! Well, they got the twins right, but not twin babies...

    Thank you, this was exactly what I needed on my break this am.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Sandy C also in SoFlaFebruary 17, 2011 at 11:15 AM

    Um, that does not look like a torso pan to me. Looks like a sheet/rectangle, with 2 half balls and a smaller sheet/rectangle.. this was deliberately constructed... poorly..

    ReplyDelete
  20. Caryn F.February 17, 2011 at 11:33 AM

    This is... I don't even know what. I think I'm going to go with creepy.

    ReplyDelete
  21. EllenFebruary 17, 2011 at 11:35 AM

    >>And it's even the wrong end of the pacifier to bring that image to mine!<<


    Oops. Meant "mind," of course.

    Typo, not Freudian slip, really!

    ReplyDelete
  22. Michelle KrassanFebruary 17, 2011 at 11:45 AM

    I am just imagining everyone at this shower (I am hoping it was a baby shower cake...) ooohing and aaaahing over this creation out loud. And wondering if they were able to control their hidden terror or laughter when the person who made or ordered this cake was in the room.

    Or sleep that night.

    ReplyDelete
  23. AnonymousFebruary 17, 2011 at 11:48 AM

    Babies, boobies...it's a natural mistake, I suppose.

    ReplyDelete
  24. AnonymousFebruary 17, 2011 at 11:49 AM

    Nine months after she opened her erotic cake business, Tina started to get numerous requests for a different kind of cake. She did not have the capital to invest in new pans, so she had to get creative.

    WV: cableduc. I have no idea what it is, but it sounds like a great product name! Even the way the letters came out made a cool-looking logo!

    ReplyDelete
  25. AnonymousFebruary 17, 2011 at 11:51 AM

    Oh! Is this what is meant when one refers to them as "The Girls"?

    ReplyDelete
  26. BADKarma!February 17, 2011 at 11:56 AM

    HUUUUUUUUGE traaahcts oov laaahnd!

    WV - Conses: Do I even have to explain? Aheh.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Cheryl_hiccupsFebruary 17, 2011 at 12:01 PM

    Calling Otto Titsling! Those girls need the influence of his Over-the-Shoulder Boulder Holder.

    ReplyDelete
  28. eGencerFebruary 17, 2011 at 12:06 PM

    This is nice also loved the lyrics :)

    ReplyDelete
  29. Auntie JFebruary 17, 2011 at 12:10 PM

    That's almost scary, especially since I have twin girls. *shudders*

    ReplyDelete
  30. DonnaFebruary 17, 2011 at 12:15 PM

    Interesting nip...errr... pacifiers...yeah, that's what my hubby would call them too...LOL


    wv: eneblum - what you do when you help someone along

    ReplyDelete
  31. KittyKatFebruary 17, 2011 at 12:16 PM

    It took me a while to see what the cake was *supposed* to be as well.

    Then I started thinking of ways they could have very easily made the cake less "questionable" in appearance.

    A simple brush of food coloring on the cheeks would have gone a LONG way. NOT putting a scalloped border around the bottom that looks like a lace under-bust bustier would have been a good call too.

    Word verification:
    pying.

    Haz yoo been 'pying on meee?

    ReplyDelete
  32. sarahFebruary 17, 2011 at 12:35 PM

    Huge... tracts of land! Love it!

    ReplyDelete
  33. ShannonFebruary 17, 2011 at 12:51 PM

    Haha! "Huge, huge... tracts of land!"

    It took me a good 5 minutes to see something other than boobs on this cake. I was trying to figure out why they had pacifier pasties on.

    ReplyDelete
  34. CarolFebruary 17, 2011 at 12:52 PM

    Yeah...all I was seeing were boobs. And since I'm at work, I was scrolling quickly so that the detention kids wouldn't be looking at the picture wondering what I was doing!!

    ReplyDelete
  35. AnonymousFebruary 17, 2011 at 12:58 PM

    Can't...comprehend...logic behind this. O_o

    ReplyDelete
  36. BrookeFebruary 17, 2011 at 12:58 PM

    GAH! Song... In head... Bleach! Bleach!

    ReplyDelete
  37. AnonymousFebruary 17, 2011 at 1:02 PM

    Donna said...
    Interesting nip...errr... pacifiers...yeah, that's what my hubby would call them too...LOL


    BWAhahahahaha

    Ok, I guess everyone else will think I'm strange . . . but, if you remove the 'twins' I think it's actually a nice cake. IF YOU REMOVE THE TWINS.

    wv: tifiders - ok, this was a lot funnier when, at first glance, I thought the f was a t.

    ReplyDelete
  38. Nerwen AldarionFebruary 17, 2011 at 1:19 PM

    As a twin...this cake TERRIFIES ME!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  39. Laura P.February 17, 2011 at 1:19 PM

    Aahhh! (scream of delight) Monty Python reference! Jen, once again you have gone up another notch in my admiration. :-) (I saw boobs too)

    ReplyDelete
  40. Travelin' MikeFebruary 17, 2011 at 1:26 PM

    Those look like boobs to me. Don't babies and boobs go together?

    ReplyDelete
  41. Jenny H.February 17, 2011 at 1:28 PM

    This obviously started out life as a lovely pregnancy cake. I suppose that the mother-to-be became a mother before the cake was delivered so they had to re-tool a bit.

    ReplyDelete
  42. AnonymousFebruary 17, 2011 at 1:36 PM

    I, too, saw boobies at first glance. You should put a note that it might not be SFW.

    But it did make me snort after figuring it out.

    ReplyDelete
  43. AlexFebruary 17, 2011 at 1:43 PM

    Wee Bubby Boobies - priceless.

    ReplyDelete
  44. CraigFebruary 17, 2011 at 1:46 PM

    Manager: "Bevis, you got away with it the first time, but we can't keep doing this! I think I can save it -- get me some baby flotsam, stat! And put that coffee down!"

    ReplyDelete
  45. AnonymousFebruary 17, 2011 at 1:54 PM

    That's just wrong. I thought those boobs had weird nipples, and then I read that it was babies. lol

    ReplyDelete
  46. MegFebruary 17, 2011 at 1:57 PM

    It looks like (besides the obvious) it should be the babyshower cake for Mr. Mackey..Mmm'kay.

    ReplyDelete
  47. AnonymousFebruary 17, 2011 at 1:58 PM

    I actually had to look for a few mins to see what it was SUPPOSE to be. WOW!!

    ReplyDelete
  48. AnonymousFebruary 17, 2011 at 1:59 PM

    Ah, I'm hearing Kathy Mattea in my head now - greeeaat. (I like her version of that song much, much better than Bette Middler. Must be the bagpipes.)

    The cake? Um, er, ah, arrrrrRRRRggghhh!
    TXRed

    ReplyDelete
  49. AnonymousFebruary 17, 2011 at 2:06 PM

    Holy what the heck! After I realized those weren't suppose to be giant boobs all I was trying to figure out is why the kids were sticking their tongues out at me. And then I realized those were pacifiers. Not to mention the children then look like their heads were severed off their bodies or something because there is no definition to anything under that blanket, either that or they are Siamese twins. No matter how you bake it, this cake is scary.

    ReplyDelete
  50. DaciaFebruary 17, 2011 at 2:08 PM

    That's what I totally thought they were too when I first saw this cake!

    ReplyDelete
  51. GaryFebruary 17, 2011 at 2:11 PM

    Oh, my.
    Thanks for a week of nightmares about talking you-know-whats.

    ReplyDelete
  52. GaryFebruary 17, 2011 at 2:18 PM

    This is why you shouldn't order cakes over the phone. Some bakery worker wasn't sure if the customer wanted "two babies" or "two boobies" on the cake, so they split the difference.

    ReplyDelete
  53. Mary ConnealyFebruary 17, 2011 at 3:11 PM

    Excuse me while I go wash my eyes out with soap in an attempt to erase this one from my mind.

    ReplyDelete
  54. AnonymousFebruary 17, 2011 at 3:33 PM

    Is this old news, or do you guys know that Graham Norton just featured your book on his talk show. He's a Brit but the show is aired here on BBC America. Congrats!

    ReplyDelete
  55. TerrsFebruary 17, 2011 at 3:58 PM

    omg i actually thought it was another prego belly cake that just really failed and instead of nipples the wreckerator used pacifiers.... then i realized it was supposed to be two baby heads in a bed........

    ReplyDelete
  56. msyendorFebruary 17, 2011 at 4:05 PM

    Oh, bounce your [babies]
    Get into the swing.
    Bounce your [babies]
    The swing is everthing.

    Makes no difference if they're big
    or small
    Long as you -- ooh --
    Give it your all!

    Dr. Demento collection, 1960s
    by Rusty Warren

    ReplyDelete
  57. GaryFebruary 17, 2011 at 4:49 PM

    Somehow, the idea that it's really two decapitated babies' heads doesn't comfort me all that much.

    ReplyDelete
  58. Stacy / Bea / VigdisFebruary 17, 2011 at 5:52 PM

    What makes this even funnier is last night's Glee...
    "...full visitation rights to the set of rambunctious twins that live on my ribcage..."
    LOL

    ReplyDelete
  59. Julia GFebruary 17, 2011 at 6:04 PM

    It wouldn't be nearly so bad if the soothers weren't all pink and perky...

    ReplyDelete
  60. Princess cupcakeFebruary 17, 2011 at 7:02 PM

    Um I'm pretty sure this cake might have looked better if it had burned down, fell over and then sank into the swamp. :0)

    ReplyDelete
  61. AnonymousFebruary 17, 2011 at 7:11 PM

    Before I scrolled down to read the post... the first thought that came into my head was that it was one of those pregnant-belly-with-boobs cakes.

    ReplyDelete
  62. AnonymousFebruary 17, 2011 at 7:52 PM

    Somebody PAID for this? Really? I mean it looks like sunken baby heads or really, really creepy boobs??? Hope it tasted better than it looked! Thanks Jen! I have a crappy job and you make me laugh!

    ReplyDelete
  63. GingerFebruary 17, 2011 at 8:02 PM

    @Cheryl_hiccups,
    Awesome! That song always makes me laugh. I used to sing it around the house, til the kids got old enough to sing along...

    ReplyDelete
  64. Sierra Sarah San DiegoFebruary 17, 2011 at 8:08 PM

    Where is the video of the singing?

    ReplyDelete
  65. annette CrouchFebruary 17, 2011 at 9:30 PM

    wow. that is the only response I can think of....wow!

    ReplyDelete
  66. AnonymousFebruary 17, 2011 at 9:33 PM

    Nipple pacifiers, ack! I always love a Python reference. Just wanted to say I love, love, love your site, makes me laugh every time (and we all need more laughter in this world)! Thanks!!!
    - Diane

    ReplyDelete
  67. UnknownFebruary 17, 2011 at 11:05 PM

    be intresting if those tongues were balloons :P

    ReplyDelete
  68. tiny purple elephantFebruary 17, 2011 at 11:39 PM

    good grief.. where have the duckies and teddies gone.

    ReplyDelete
  69. ArleneFebruary 18, 2011 at 1:34 AM

    Lol!! Who on earth thought that was a great idea for a cake? Wow..super scary things that are supposed to be babies but look like super large..boobies lol. I fear for the sanity of whoever received this cake.

    ReplyDelete
  70. wordsmith101February 18, 2011 at 7:14 AM

    For some reason once I got past the "boob" impression I thought this looks like the baby Evelyn Evelyn ... (Eva and Lyn Neville, fictional conjoined twins.)

    ReplyDelete
  71. AnonymousFebruary 18, 2011 at 8:42 AM

    As an owner of a boob cake pan, I never ONCE thought of using said cake pan to make baby heads. Now, I'm suddenly feeling the need to make a variety of boob cakes and decorate them as other things... snowmen, babies, bowties...oh the possibilities are endless.

    ReplyDelete
  72. AnonymousFebruary 18, 2011 at 9:20 AM

    Hee! Monty Python references never get old.

    ReplyDelete
  73. ValFebruary 18, 2011 at 9:47 AM

    That obscure Monty Python quote just made my day.

    ReplyDelete
  74. Danger BoyFebruary 18, 2011 at 10:20 AM

    I've stared and stared, and they still look like boobs.

    ReplyDelete
  75. MagsFebruary 18, 2011 at 11:26 AM

    Nothing says, "EAT ME!" like a pair of giant boobs with pacifiers sticking out of them... Yeah... That's appetizing...!
    ;)

    ReplyDelete
  76. CraigFebruary 18, 2011 at 12:58 PM

    @Mags wins the 'let me rephrase that' award for 2011. [innocent whistling...]

    ReplyDelete
  77. AngieFebruary 18, 2011 at 1:24 PM

    Yikes.

    Just yikes.

    ReplyDelete
  78. AnonymousFebruary 18, 2011 at 2:17 PM

    @Anon at Fri 8:42am:

    If you do, submit them so we can see!

    ReplyDelete
  79. Lady BrightFebruary 19, 2011 at 10:42 AM

    I've decided I have an interesting husband. He saw twin girl babies. (he says it's because he saw the baby bottles on the lower half of the cake)

    I think he just didn't want to admit anything.

    Chuckling at 'the twins' and Python reference. You make my day.

    !!Di

    ReplyDelete
  80. JayFebruary 19, 2011 at 12:47 PM

    My reaction was hysterical laughter. My husband's was better:

    "HEYYYYYyyyyy.....EEEWWWWWwwwwwww!"

    I think it was the eyes that creeped him out.

    wv: boutfu "Aw, what boutfu boubies!"

    ReplyDelete
  81. ThatDeborahGirlFebruary 19, 2011 at 4:52 PM

    I really thought they were boobs. Why do people do stuff like this?
    Why?

    ReplyDelete
  82. UnknownFebruary 19, 2011 at 9:24 PM

    These are seriously supposed to look like babies?????

    uh...oooooookay.

    ReplyDelete

All comments are reviewed before being published; please allow up to 6 hours for your comment to be posted.

Profanity, mean-spirited remarks, anonymous criticism & blatant advertising will not be published.

To submit a cake link, go to our contact page.

Remember to post your name!